Before bulk-editing unbilled time, a litigation firm should preserve the selected entries, record the exact approved change and assign a reviewer for the result. Keep a before snapshot in the firm’s approved system. Treat that snapshot as comparison evidence, not an undo function or approval to change what a client owes.
What does Clio document about bulk changes?
Clio’s current time-entry guide says bulk edits change every selected entry and do not retain the earlier details. Bulk editing requires the relevant permission. Its activity export guide supports filtered CSV or PDF exports; CSV includes creation and update timestamps.
Those product facts explain why a firm needs a deliberate pre-change decision. The review method below is our suggested administrative control, not a Clio-prescribed procedure, a billing audit or a legal requirement. It concerns corrections to existing records, not writing narratives, creating time or issuing invoices.
How should the firm define the batch before editing?
Start with a written request that identifies the intended records and the field to change. “Fix the time entries” is too broad for someone to act on reliably. Specify the matters, timekeepers, activity dates and any other selection conditions, then distinguish the requested correction from fields that must stay as recorded.
For example, a hypothetical request to correct a timekeeper assignment should not quietly become permission to change duration, rate or billable status. The requester should explain the approved replacement and who authorized it. An assistant should refer missing or conflicting instructions to the designated billing lead or attorney.
Record the number of selected entries and the selection conditions with the request. A reviewer needs to know what was included, not just the resulting total. Keep an internal reference to each record where the system makes one available.
What makes a before snapshot useful?
Check that the saved material shows the fields needed for the proposed correction. An exported file with the right name may still represent the wrong scope. Open it, confirm its contents and record when and by whom it was prepared. If a needed value is absent, follow the firm’s approved method for recording it rather than assuming it can be recovered later.
| Record | Purpose | Review question |
|---|---|---|
| Selection note | Defines the batch | Do these records match the request? |
| Before snapshot | Retains values for comparison | Are the intended fields readable and complete? |
| Change approval | Defines permitted action | Who approved each replacement value? |
| After comparison | Records observed differences | Does the result match that approval? |
Keep the original snapshot separate from working annotations. Store both within the approved matter or billing environment with appropriate access. Time-entry descriptions can contain confidential matter information. A public AI tool, personal mailbox or general shared folder is not a substitute for the firm’s approved handling process.
Who should approve and check the change?
Separate preparation, authorization and verification in the record, even when the firm’s staffing model assigns more than one step to the same person. Technical permission to edit does not establish authority to decide a fee, write off time or change the firm’s billing treatment.
The authorized operator should compare the actual selection with the approved batch immediately before acting. If another person has changed relevant entries since the snapshot, return that difference to the reviewer. Do not silently replace the earlier evidence or treat a stale instruction as current approval.
After the approved edit, prepare a comparison using the same intended scope. Check changed fields, unchanged fields and record count. A matching grand total alone can conceal offsetting mistakes. Mark which differences were expected and identify exceptions individually so the reviewer can decide what happens next.
What if the result does not match the request?
Stop further batch corrections and preserve the observed result. Record the discrepancy, affected internal references and the last action taken. Tell the designated reviewer what is known and what remains uncertain. Do not try a second broad change merely to make the summary look right.
The firm decides whether a correction, further investigation or vendor support is needed. A retained export helps explain the earlier state, but it does not establish an automatic restore path or prove that a later invoice is correct. Keep the exception open until the responsible person records a decision.
What education and practical skills fit this assignment?
Look for accurate reading, spreadsheet comparison and clear written explanations. Relevant legal or paralegal study can help a person understand matter organization and attorney review. Confirm the proposed individual’s education and experience, then test the actual task with fictional records.
A useful exercise asks the candidate to identify the intended batch, notice an unexpected field change and write a short exception note. Ask them to explain which decision belongs to the attorney or billing lead. A degree label does not establish Clio proficiency, accounting authority or permission to alter charges.
Remote Legal Team LLC can discuss attorney-directed billing administration support within the firm’s defined instructions. Review education and role fit alongside the work sample. Your firm retains billing decisions and final approval. This is operational information, not legal or accounting advice.
Frequently asked questions
Does Clio keep the original values after a bulk time-entry edit?
Its current guide says the earlier entry details are not retained. Preserve the firm’s approved comparison evidence before acting, and do not assume an edit can be reversed automatically.
Is an activity export an undo file?
Treat it as review evidence. Confirm which fields it contains. A saved export does not by itself restore records, authorize a correction or establish that client charges are proper.
Can a legal assistant decide which time should be written off?
The assistant should follow the firm’s designated approval process. They can prepare the selected-record comparison and identify exceptions, but this workflow gives them no independent authority to decide fees or write-offs.
How should a firm assess someone for time-entry review work?
Check relevant education and experience, then use a fictional comparison exercise. Look for accurate selection, readable evidence and a clear explanation of what needs the reviewer’s decision.
Sources
- Clio: Time Entries. Updated August 17, 2026. Narrow product behavior and permissions; checked October 4, 2026, Eastern time.
- Clio: Filter and Export Activities. Updated August 17, 2026. Export formats and timestamp fields; checked October 4, 2026, Eastern time.
