Approved tools and data
Use only firm-approved systems, permissions and data categories.
Human-led. Attorney-supervised. AI-enabled.
AI-assisted contract abstraction prepares source-linked draft terms and clause references from approved agreements. A remote contract assistant checks each entry against the executed document and relevant amendments. AI does not interpret enforceability, recommend a negotiating position or approve obligations. Counsel decides how the terms affect the organization.
Custom pricing. Scope and price confirmed in writing.
Legal support outsourcing should begin with role fit. Review the proposed specialist’s education, relevant experience, writing and practical work against the task. LL.B., LL.M., J.D. and paralegal training describe different pathways; they do not establish U.S. attorney licensure.
Use a synthetic exercise that requires source checks and handling an unclear answer. Agree the review owner and permissions before a person or tool receives access.
Explore education and vetting ↗A renewal date appears in the original agreement, but an amendment changes the term. A summary omits the exception that makes the clause conditional. The register needs the controlling source and a visible review status, not just a clean spreadsheet.
The proposed build changes the preparation and review process. It is not a measured client result.
Contract abstraction stays with executed agreements: extracting source-linked facts, obligations, dates, and renewal details into a reviewed register.
If you need pre-signature draft preparation, approved playbook checks, or exception handling when proposed language falls outside firm rules, use the separate drafting review path.
We first check your current plan, permissions and supported interfaces. A missing feature or API entitlement becomes a scope decision, not an assumed integration. An approved Ollama deployment with a separately approved model may prepare draft extraction. Tesseract may help with scanned text. Neither component determines the legal effect of an agreement.
Ollama product and license referenceTesseract OCR product and license reference
The contract assistant compares each value with the cited clause and checks related amendments. They preserve qualifiers, check party names within approved records and flag uncertain precedence. A blank field is preferable to an invented contractual term.
Contract interpretation, legal effect, enforceability, negotiation, notice requirements and approval of commitments.
ABA Formal Opinion 512: generative AI guidanceABA Model Rule 5.3: nonlawyer assistance
Use a fictional agreement and amendment with conflicting renewal terms. The draft register should cite both, preserve the conflict and require counsel to determine which term controls.
The acceptance record identifies the source version, reviewer, expected result and unresolved exceptions. These are proposed synthetic tests, not a claim about a completed client deployment.
We scope the records, systems, review steps and acceptance tests before estimating timing. Fixed-scope projects. Pricing confirmed in writing before work starts. Hosting, model usage, software plans and support are identified separately where applicable.
A Build Sprint delivers the agreed workflow and a documented handoff to your team. A Managed AI Operator engagement adds a trained person to run review queues, check every output and escalate exceptions. The build and human seat are separate scope items.
A person remains accountable
Use only firm-approved systems, permissions and data categories.
Label every AI output as a draft and route it to a named human reviewer.
Keep a source link or document/page reference for every extracted fact.
Log missing evidence, conflicting inputs and failed steps. Never silently fill gaps.
AI never makes legal decisions or gives advice. Nothing is sent to a client, court or opposing party without attorney approval.
Remote Legal Team LLC states SOC 2 Type II security. Confirm report scope, period and covered services during diligence; it does not certify every proposed tool or make a workflow automatically compliant.
No. We first assess the firm-approved tools and interfaces you already have. A separate component is proposed only when its purpose, license, data access and cost are agreed.
Contract interpretation, legal effect, enforceability, negotiation, notice requirements and approval of commitments. AI output remains a draft and all legal work stays under attorney direction and approval.
Pricing is custom and confirmed in writing against the agreed scope. We identify build work, software or hosting costs and any ongoing human operator separately.
Checked October 13, 2026. Product access depends on the current account, plan and configuration.
LET’S PLAN YOUR ORGANIZATION’S SUPPORT
Describe the workflow, approved systems, expected draft output and review owner. We will confirm the scope and custom pricing in writing before work starts.
We’ll discuss relevant education and experience, workload, coverage, commercial terms and your review process.
Describe the workflow, expected outputs, review owner and preferred timing. Business requirements only; do not include confidential documents or personal data. Required fields are marked *. Read our Privacy Policy and Website Terms.
Discuss contract ai abstraction & outsourced legal support, your team’s workload and the next steps for your organization.